I ostensibly picked up a copy of Rayman because I wanted to see how it compared to the PlayStation version. It’s not like I don’t want to be challenged, but as Lisa Simpson once so eloquently put it, I want a challenge that I can do! Ultimately I just find overly difficult games stressful to play. I can usually finish your typical AAA game but when it comes to slightly more difficult ones I have a very real chance of wilting under the pressure at any moment. I know it’s not seen as de rigueur for one to admit that perhaps they aren’t particularly good at a certain game in this line of work, but I’m hardly an elite gamer and make no bones about it. Picture Courtesy of Excuse me sir, can I please have my bollocks back? This memory was indeed correct, but what my memory banks had failed to remind me was how ludicrously difficult the game became as you advanced onward. I recalled it being a bright and colourful plat former which rewarded your character with better abilities and powers as you advanced through the game. I never actually had Rayman on my PlayStation, but I had played it previously at a friend’s house. Was it my more nimble reflexes that enabled me to conquer them? Am I now too old and crusty to keep up with the pace? Was the fact that I was free to spend almost endless hours over holidays and weekends playing certain levels over and over that I was eventually able to literally force myself over the finish line? Has the shortening of my free time and widening of other interests combined to make me so woeful at the games of yore that they now pummel me into whimpering submission? Or were games just harder “back in the day” than they are now? What if games themselves have actually gotten easier to complete and I’ve just stayed exactly where I am, getting neither better nor worse? It was these questions that I pondered, amongst muffled screams of frustration, after roughly my 30th death during my play through of Rayman. This game is great and I'll personally recommend it to anyone (child-to-adult, fan or no-fan of Star Wars).Sometimes I look back to the days of my youth and wonder how the chuffing fudge I managed it to complete some of the video games I completed back then. But still, it's not bad and that it's only a nitpick, nothing seriously needed to take into account. But, the Star Wars music doesn't sound like those in the movies. If there's one con that I had to nitpick about, it's the background music. Even now, it still feels like a simulation that one can get sucked into. crashing and thus losing a life) felt real. The spacecrafts and vehicles look just like those in the Star Wars movies, and the impact (a.k.a. As of now, the graphics aren't as beautiful as the nowadays kinds. Tie Fighter games, you really feel like you're inside the cockpit, piloting these spacecrafts and going through these missions these engulfing feelings can get into you whether in PC (keyboard or joystick) or video games. Even though they're limited to planets & 1 space station (Death Star), meaning there's no battles in space like Rogue Squadron 2 or X-Wing vs. In the 1998 standards, the graphics are great, and the dog fighting simulations are very enjoyable and really engulfing. I'll never forget that moment of how much fun and enjoyment it was. In the 1998 standards, Had this when I was a child, around 1998-1999. Had this when I was a child, around 1998-1999.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |